Shut Up and Feed the Poor

Last September, when the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Citizen’s United vs. the FEC, I wrote a blog (A New Era of Political Equity) articulating what I felt would be the ramifications for nonprofits should the court decide that corporations have First Amendment, free speech rights akin to those of the individual.

Yesterday’s decision, which “rejects limits of corporate spending on political campaigns” now insures that virtually everybody in America, along with corporations and unions, has the right to overtly advocate for, or against, a candidate or incumbent…except for America’s 1.4 million nonprofit organizations/businesses. We alone must remain silent.

Each of us must now consider this reality. In a year in which 36 states will elect new governor’s, and countless cities will elect mayors, we who feed the poor, shelter homeless vets, nurture the elderly, sustain the arts, protect the environment, care for the sick, educate children, etc…must sit on the sidelines and bear silent witness to a process that relies on our work, yet excludes our voice.

There’s a word for this….”wrong”.

And while I for one will work tirelessly to challenge this dynamic, none of us can, or should, loose sight of the fact that we do have power. There are 100 million people who work at, or volunteer with, any number of America’s dynamic nonprofit organizations. Our votes have currency.

We must recognize that we and we alone, are the ONLY force that can provide a counter-balance to powers that would emphasize dividends over citizens.

We must realize that this can ONLY be achieved when set aside historic, understandable, yet detrimental divisions, and finally and firmly stand together. Only from that vantage point will we be able to ask, and insure, that each candidate provides derailed plans for how they would use EVERY asset in the community to achieve their vision for a city, a state or our country.

It could take time, to be sure, to evolve from the cacophony of causes that now mutes our shared potential….but we don’t have the luxury of time.  That is why I, for one, am ready to join my voice with yours, and yours, and yours and yours….and I am ready to do it today, so that, regardless of how much money one group spends in a campaign—the community we share will come first.

To that end, I ask you to join me…and all the others who have already signed up for the V3 Campaign, so that the Voice, Value and Votes of the nonprofit sector is heard–legally, and loud and clear–in every election.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

15 Responses to “Shut Up and Feed the Poor”

  1. Guy Arceneaux Says:

    Very erudite comments on this latesty justice travesty. No one has brought up the nonprofit aspect as far as I have seen Mr. Egger.
    I’ll retweet throughout the day.

    Regards,
    Guy

  2. Robert Egger Says:

    Thanks, Guy. I’m stunned by the deafening silence in the face of this decision and the role it allocates for nonprofits. We are the new face of Dread Scott. While I always try to temper my temper…this one begs for a stone, well thrown.

  3. lauratomasko (Laura Tomasko) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    As @v3campaign asks, what about #nonprofits? RT @dcck: DCCK founder @robertegger responds to campaign finance ruling: [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  4. mycoloradoproj (My Colorado Project) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    RT @robertegger: Blog on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations (and not #nonprofits) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  5. dcck (DC Central Kitchen) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    DCCK founder @robertegger responds to campaign finance ruling: [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  6. nonprofitnicole (Nicole Watson) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    This is a must read RT @robertegger: Blog on the Supreme Court ruling that corps (and not npos) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  7. annstary (Ann Stary) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    Sad blog post for nonprofits: RT @robertegger: Supreme Court ruling that corps (and not nfps) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  8. jjguthrie (John Guthrie) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    RT @robertegger: A new blog on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations (and not #nonprofits) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  9. robertegger (robert egger) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    @RigaRefugee Our votes have currency. THAT is the only counter-balance that can tip the crazy scale. Here’s my take [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  10. robertegger (robert egger) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    A new blog on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations (and not #nonprofits) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  11. DDavenport (David Davenport) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    RT@robertegger: A new blog on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations (and not #nonprofits) have free speech rights [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  12. WatchdogGraphic (Andrea Gates Sanford) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    Shut Up and Feed the Poor [link to post] — @RobertEgger

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  13. Supreme Court decision & nonprofits… Teen pregnancies up [News, 1.26.10] « Washington Grantmakers Daily Says:

    [...] Supreme Court decision & nonprofits… Teen pregnancies up [News, 1.26.10] ADVOCACY | Opinion: A New Era for Nonprofit Advocacy? (Chronicle, 1/26) – The recent Supreme Court decision about campaign financing applies to nonprofits, too…I think. That’s how the Chronicle article reads to me, but Robert Egger thinks nonprofits are still being muzzled. [...]

  14. Perla Ni Says:

    Thanks for making this very important point. The Supreme Court’s decision is so disappointing on so many levels. I’d like to see a legal challenge on why nonprofits are excluded from the definition of corporation.

    It would be a great pro bono project for a law firm out there.

  15. Robert Egger Says:

    I’ve been working that angle since the Citizens case was heard in September. There have been a few attempts to force the issue, particularly in the final months of the 2008 Presidential race, when ministers linked up to politic from the pulpit. The problem appears that the IRS isn’t taking the bait—they simply want to avoid a test case.

    I’ll keep you posted, Perla….so nice to heard from you. GREAT work at Great Nonprofits!!!

    OH, and here’s a link to another op-ed on this topic, thanks to Jan at Blue Avocado….http://bit.ly/9UQNha

Leave a Reply


Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.