The Super Green Intervale Center

July 22nd, 2010

I tell you what….I’ve visited hundreds of cities, and been blown away by many, but Burlington, VT is so way up on the list….and the reasons are legion. There’s a super bad Campus Kitchen at UVM (that partners with our friends at FeelGood). The Vermont Food Bank has a superior community kitchen that trains folks and feeds the soul of their city. BOTH Magic Hat and Switchback breweries continue to demonstrate the social enterprise ethos by paying good wages, promoting green practices and re-investing profit back into the community. City government and particularly Bruce Seifer, the Dir. of the Office of Economic Development provide one of the most advanced examples of how cities can THRIVE when they embrace the “small is smart, local business first” manta that too many mock, when they should be emulating.

But one of the things I dig the most is the amazing Intervale Center, right in the center of town. Bold, Smart, Growing, Green and Loved by all, the Intervale is a take your breath away example of a communities vision come true. Led by Glenn McRae and a solid gold staff, they are always up for getting down. Check it OUT.

Post Script–While in Burlington, I did a presentation with Michael Shuman, the Co-Founder of Balle, the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies. He is an amazing thinker, and the work they are doing to help communites and  elected officials GET the power of local business is right in sync with the goals of the V3 Campaign—help/elect people who are not burdened by the false, boring divide between .com and .org. The future is coming, and it lies in the middle.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

Three Short Video’s on Social E

June 16th, 2010

Here are three short video’s that my friend Larry Robertson recorded in my “liberator festooned” office, to accompany his book on Social Enterprise, A Deliberate Pause , in which I was happily profiled. In fact…he truly “got” what we do here at DC Central Kitchen. I urge you to grab a copy of his book!!!

The first video is on the theory of change.

And another on the very concept of Social Enterprise.

And the final is about the V3 Campaign.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

High Hopes in Toronto and Texas

June 10th, 2010

For the first time in wayyy to long, here’s a video from the road.

I started out on this adventure a few days back, with a hop across the border to Toronto, a town I last visited (thanks to my sweet Momma) back in 78, when there was a first-time-in-long-time exhibit of Van Gogh’s works, which was making only one North American stop–up there.

Given my adoration for all things Vincent, my mom’s generosity and the fact that keithKeith Richards had also just been busted there (where he gave his infamous quote “I don’t have a drug problem, I have a police problem”) I figured that fate was calling, so I ventured out on one of those formative, first time on your own, trips that you remember all your life.

Anyway…this time up, I was being hosted by friends from MaRS, a marvelous collaborative effort that is really one of the most innovative and purposeful collections of social enterprise leaders, researchers, lawyers and do-ers north of Tierra Del Fuego, period.

I was there to speak about nonprofit unity, which (like here) is equally illusive up there. But, like us, they have a major national election coming up in 2012, so, like here, there is NO TIME like the present to begin to work, build and partner. It was a great crowd, and we really hit it off (I owe Beth Kanter props for tenderizing them, as only she can, with her keynote the day before).

Here’s a great blog post  from Super Joe that speaks to our dialogue (and a suprise drive-by by Warren B) as well as a video of my presentation (if you can spare 45 minutes or so).

Afterwards, the fine team at MaRS and I talked tactics and prizes—they have their eyes on a juicy one—a Social Bond like they are exploring in the UK, which would provide a “dividend” for people savvy enough to spot programs like, if I may be so bold, DCCK, which can show verifiable, cash money, return on investment.

The key, of course, if electing people (don’t forget, they have a Minister of the Third Sector in the UK, and ALL major parties openly vie for the votes of nonprofit employees with detailed plans for partnership) who understand the potential and work to bust through the dumbo .com/.org divide.

OK…so now I’m in Texas, at the invitation of my great colleagues at TANO, the Texas Association of Nonprofit Organizations, as well as the San Antonio Foundation, for a talk about similar opportunities for nonprofits in the Lone Star State, where they will be electing a Governor in a few months.

But, as soon as I landed, I took up an offer I received a few weeks back, when I was here to speak at the 25th anniversary celebration of Communities in Schools, to visit Haven for Hope, which, like MaRS is an truly triumphant collaboration between direct service homeless providers that have come together to try something truly unique—leaving their past, individual efforts behind to partner in a new, central location where they are working hard, everyday, to achieve better, consistent, measurable outcomes.

They’ve got in all, Man…..dig THIS.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

A Volunteer Bill of Rights

May 11th, 2010

Today, the DC Central Kitchen will unveil a new effort that we hope will push our own organizational envelope, while also jump-starting the semi-stalled dialogue about the future of philanthropy in America…..a Volunteer Bill of Rights.

I serve on the board or advisory board for a bunch of great organizations (including Charity Navigator, The Alliance for Effective Social Investing, The Philanthropic Collaborative and Great Nonprofits) which have convened some of the best minds in the biz to see if we can use our collective brain power to help free the sector’s finances (and future) from the grip of what we ALL agree is the intellectual tar of “low administrative overhead”.

To that great goal, we have devoted numerous meetings to discussions revolving around which metrics can or should be measured, in what order, and most importantly, to what ends.

Naturally, this led us to genuflect to the need for outside evaluation—to the proxy of an unbiased third-party that would “certify” that groups actually do what they say they do.

I dig this direction, as this would help donors see that sometimes, things that look good, sound good and feel good can actually be astoundingly lame (For example: serving LOTS of meals sounds good, but it really isn’t, unless the meals being served are healthy. One clogs the arteries, the other frees the mind…ya dig?)

Which got me thinking….

Back in the day, when I was running nightclubs, there were really only a handful of “great” restaurants in America, and they were all French, period. Now, just about EVERY city in America boasts a bevy of great dining establishments. How did that happen?

I’ll tell you. Restaurant critics (often women writers who, in the 1960’s and 70’s, were relegated to the “women’s page” of the local paper) began to explore a new way of reviewing restaurants. This generation of writers began with a simple concept—diners had rights—and they crafted a whole new set of metrics that used “diner’s dollars” as the sharp point of their critical pens. They championed a new generation of American chefs by telling an escalating number of diners that they did not have to take what was served and like it—they could send it back. They could demand better. And demand they did. Soon, restaurant managers were training staff to be more accommodating and to talk to customers about the ingredients of the food. Open kitchens began to appear. Soon chefs began to come out of the kitchen to greet increasingly sophisticated diners and sit with them to talk about food theory, locally sourced products, green practices and giving back to community. And now, with the advent of the internet, comes technology that allows ANY customer to review a restaurant. And, it is because of that customer driven system that just about EVERY community in America now boasts numerous great restaurants that continue to push the boundries.

So rather than set out on a course that would have us hire expensive experts to verify what we do at DCCK….we did what we always do—look right in front of us—and we found close to 14,000 potential evaluators waiting on deck: the men and women, students and families who volunteer with us every year.

Frankly, if DCCK volunteers, and America’s 60 million volunteers start asking…no, demanding that they be told, in detail, what they did and why its important to the community–what the investment of their time helped grow–THAT will drive innovation a whole lot faster than another “Y x Z x % of Pi = Good” formula.

So, as of tomorrow, the Volunteer Bill of Rights will be posted throughout ALL DCCK business locations (including the 26 amazing Campus Kitchens).  It gets right to the point—ALL volunteers have the right to:

  • Work in a safe environment.
  • Be treated with respect by all staff members.
  • Be engaged in meaningful work and be actively included regardless of any physical limitations.
  • Be told what impact your work made in the community.
  • Ask any staff member questions about our work.
  • Provide feedback about your experience.
  • Receive a copy of our financial information or annual report upon request.

Some of these rights are, of course, pretty obvious….but by publicly committing to these standards, we hope that volunteers will see this list and will feel comfortable talking to ANY member of our team–that they will dig deep into our financial reports and they will ask us hard questions and push harder still for details, which we are, to a team member, double down ready to provide.

All of these rights are important….but the most purposeful of these is the one right in the middle—the right to “be told what impact your work made in the community”. THAT’S the kicker. We want, and think it’s critical, that every nonprofit in America be prepared to answer that question, in detail. No more fuzzy, feel good platitudes.  No more bromides, brothers and sisters—it’s about facts and figures. Verifiable, Hard Core, Detailed Deeds.

Look, like a whole bunch of you, we are really excited by how much we pack into our 24-7-365 programs, and we WANT volunteers to ask LOTS of questions. To that end, we were thrilled to be a lead partner with our colleague and friend, Perla Ni at Great Nonprofits when they recently launched their new volunteer review project, which empowers volunteers to rate their experiences at programs like DCCK. She and her partners at Guidestar are way out front on this and they deserve big props.

But, this isn’t a time for talk, or theory or more meeting….this is a time for movement. The wheat is being seperated from the chaffe, baby….and the winds are blowing harder and harder everyday.

So see the future. Be part of making something bigger happen. We are an open source organization, so feel free to use this Bill of Rights in your shop.  Add more rights if you see fit. If they rock, let us know so we can adapt our version. Call if you want and we’ll talk about how we trained our staff to translate talking to volunteers about these rights into opportunities to elevate the idea of what we are doing, together, so that folks can’t wait to come back—with friends, time and wallets in tow. 

This isn’t  about bucks…it’s about change….but we’re bucking the system to get us there.

Rights ON.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

Top Ten Recap for the @YNPN’s

April 25th, 2010
YNPN_biggerI was just in Denver, where I was honored to be able to speak to the members of the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network who had gathered in the Mile High City to talk taking it up a notch. 
 
Here a fast run down of my tips for them (minus the f-bombs):
 
1. When YNPN first got started, the only word in its name that was accurate was “young”. Now, YNPN is a powerful network of seasoned pros. Build on that. Post each others blogs, videos and op-eds. Constantly encourage each other. RT w/abandon. Support each others research and champion advocacy efforts. Get each other gigs. Be a good friend in practice, and practice being a good friend.
 
2. If you want to change the world, then heed the words of Dorothy Height, who said, “If the times aren’t ripe, you have to ripen the times.”
 
3. Modern charity has its roots in gender and race boundaries of 20th century America. The tens of thousands of charities that opened back then (that were founded primarily by women) were limited by the male dominated culture that made the wealth and administered the foundation system. As such, grants were mainly made to groups that engaged in non-threatening charity and not to groups that sought to use economics or politics to challenge the status quo of the day.
 
4. For 40 years, we’ve made that “redemption of the giver, not liberation of the receiver” charity model bigger, and then bigger still. Understand its origins. Always show respect for the intent and work of the founding mothers, but understand the unintended, but inherent limitations of this model….and the cost your generation would have to shoulder to maintain it.
 
5. Don’t buy the “leadership vacuum” myth. There are thousands of Gen Xers who have been in the mix for a long time before you, and like you, they are more than ready to assume leadership roles. The real question for anyone who seeks to lead–where are we going?
 
6. The Periodic Table of the wall of that university lecture hall where we met had only 103 elements listed. There are now 117. It is out-of-date. This can also be said about the attitudes and policies that govern nonprofits in America. For any new leadership to be able to move beyond the limits of the traditional charity model, then we must challenge outdated ideas, starting with the divide between .com and .org 
 
7. This will take new policies, and for new policies to be enacted, we must elect a new generation of leaders (some could be you) who understand the stakes and realize the potential of every community if all its resources are utilized with vision and courage. They must understand the potential that nonprofits have to help rebuild the local, state and national economy. Given the size and scope of our sector, these new leaders should be prepared to appoint dedicated leadership within their administration to explore every option to better integrate the strengths of business, community and government (as Mayor Hickenlooper has done with the Office of Strategic Partnerships).
 
7. It sounds daunting, but ponder the resources we have to work with. Ahead of you are 80 million Baby Boomers. The oldest is only 65. They are the generation that raged against the machine, but then settled down, moved to the suburbs and gave at the office. Now, as they look forward, many are wondering how they strayed so far from the proverbial garden. As they seek to re-engage in community and account for their lives, they are pouring into the sector, all but dying to be part of making something truly powerful happen. With them will come powerful social, economic and political opportunities. RIPEN the times.  
 
8. Behind you are the Millenials, America’s most diverse generation….and they are also 80 million strong. The oldest is only 25. They have been raised doing community service. Like you, they would love to merge work, life and spirit and find new ways to make a living, while making the world a better place to live. With them will come powerful social, economic and political opportunities. RIPEN the times. 
 
9. The times are already half ripe. Interest in sustainability, healthy food, healthcare, fair trade products, social enterprise, micro-credit, volunteerism, farmers’ markets, new media–these are signs that people of all generations are seeking something very important, but missing in too many people’s lives–a sense of community. They are (clumsily at times) looking to re-engage…but are afraid. Help them over the divide. They are (clumsily at times) looking for new set of values to replace the “I am my paycheck” culture….but are equally as nervous about the new metrics of meaning. Help them see the value (and joy) of being engaged and liking where you work, what you do and the way you lead your life. Help them see that the future of philanthropy will be how you make and spend your money…and voting for people who will help us get there. 
 
10. It won’t be easy…nothing good is….but WE can SO do this. It will take courage, brains, tactics…and you. Go for it. Stand on the shoulders of giants and help others up so that ALL may wonder at the new view.
 
Let’s RIPEN the world.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post

In Honor of Cesar

March 31st, 2010

chavez

A fast is first and foremost personal. It is a fast for the purification of my own body, mind, and soul. The fast is also a heartfelt prayer for purification and strengthening for all those who work beside me in the farm worker movement. The fast is also an act of penance for those in positions of moral authority and for all men and women activists who know what is right and just, who know that they could and should do more.”

Today is Cesar Chavez’s birthday. I’ve written and spoken of him many, many times over the last three years, as I see him, along with King and Gandhi, as one of the great liberators of the last century. When I say “great liberator”, I don’t mean it in the traditional, almost romantic way we view liberators. Too often we want to see them as lofty saints, versus clever tacticians, which I believe limits their legacy. I’m not interested in holding somebody up as somehow different or above it all. Chavez was a simple man, plain and simple, who stood up, used his head and worked hard-everyday-to fight for a better world. Nor do I use the term because he fought for the rights of migrant farmers (and won), or because he organized and built the United Farm Workers, or because he fasted numerous times to draw attention to the quest. No, I use it because he recognized, like King and Gandhi, that the liberation of the oppressed was linked with the liberation of the oppressor. He knew that both sides were afflicted, and each needed to be healed if true justice was ever to be achieved. In short—he sought to liberate all. Each of these leaders used “non-violent resistance” to challenge authority and build momentum behind their goals. But their goal was never to simply organize those at the bottom, but to challenge—intellectually and spiritually—the members of the larger society who often were unaware of their role in the system that kept farm workers poorly paid, uneducated and living in squalid conditions.

If I may….the fight so many of us wage should not be about organizing the poor, but helping the vast majority of Americana’s overcome the understandable fear they have of thinking about why there ARE poor. The average American is a just, caring, generous person who truly wants to see a world that is color blind, even and fair. BUT they are afraid of the hard work and, frankly, sacrifices they will have to be part of if we are to get there. Simply put…it’s easier to think that if you are poor, left out or uneducated—it’s because you are lazy, dumb or unwilling to work. That’s what King, Gandhi and Chavez understood….and they sought to find imaginative and evocative ways to guide folks into this larger conversation. THAT’S why they were liberators…because they disguised the liberation of one group as a way to engage the larger community in a dialogue that would liberate everyone.

In Cesar’s case, he used the Grape Boycott. In 1966, he launched “La Causa” a multi-year campaign, to highlight the plight of farm workers. By 1969, led in large part by students, millions had boycotted grapes at home and at school to show their solidarity with underpaid and undervalued farm workers. Finally, on July 29, 1970…the first union contracts were signed. Not only had he helped organize and unite farm workers, but he engaged the larger citizenry in the discussion and got them to see that they had a role to play.

Let me cut to the chase….and make two big points.

1. When we romanticize leaders like Chavez, or see them as merely fighters for the rights of the poor, we limit their real agenda—which was to uplift the entire population and initiate a broader dialogue. Issues like exclusion, poverty, hunger and the like will not go away unless we talk about them and reason together to find a way out—together. It will not be easy, as fear makes most resistant to the dialogue. We must meet people where they are and guide them to the table.
2. Cesar Chavez got this country to the table using grapes. Do not loose site of that. Gandhi used salt. Dr. King used the dimes it took to ride the buses of Montgomery. Liberators don’t brandish weapons, nor do they descend from on high—the great ones use simple ideas in profound ways to bring people together…..and they never give up.

Neither should we.

Happy Birthday, Mr. Chavez.

(This blog post was origionally posted on this day in 2006. I post it ever year on the day we honor the memory and work of Cesar Chavez)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post


Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.