A New Era of Political Equity
For the past 40 years, nonprofits have, by and large, abstained from local, state and national political dialogues. This is not to say that all nonprofits refrained from participating. Quite the contrary, as groups like MoveOn, NOW, the Rainbow Coalition, Greenpeace, the Heritage Foundation and America Forward illustrate, numerous nonprofit organizations utilized advocacy with great effect–hastening the enactment of laws and policies that assured equality in the workplace, protected our environment, created greater transparency of government and guaranteed the right to vote to all who are eligible.
But the majority of the sector remained focused on the simple day-to-day advocacy of earnest effort–they just worked hard to make their communities whole. Most refrained from advocacy due to the perceived illegality of nonprofits voicing a political preference. Others venture in, but worried that stepping too close to choosing one candidate or party over the other publicly (as singular voters) would lead to their organization being excluded when grants or contracts were doled out by the victor. Many were just poorly led—often by organization or association leaders who were either risk adverse by training or temperament or who grew comfortable over time with the status quo of day to day leadership, quarterly meetings or annual conferences (all of which is, quite frankly, quite normal).
But all that has changed now, as both the Supreme Court and a Federal Court heard arguments or handed down decisions that remove historic regulations that governed how campaigns are financed.
On September 9th, the Supreme Court heard arguments suggesting that corporate limits on political contributions were an infringement of their first amendment rights. (FYI—corporations are viewed under law as having rights similar to the individual, hence the tact that campaign-finance laws infringe upon their rights of free speech.)
Then on Friday, September 18th, a federal court, siding with the nonprofit advocacy group, Emily’s List, removed barriers for similar campaign finance efforts by nonprofits.
This means that now, for better or worse, the Pandora’s Box of Political Engagement is wide open….and with it comes the predictable good news and bad news.
First the bad news.
Those who express grave concern over the unregulated flow of funds from corporate treasuries into political campaigns are correct. There are 36 governor’s races in 2010, and we will soon see a tsunami of money POUR into an already polluted political process. EVERY citizen in America should be concerned over the ability of corporations to influence, or BUY political offices outright.
Which brings me to the good news.
These rulingss all but remove archaic barriers to nonprofits political involvement, and give us virtually unlimited ability to speak truth to power….and we must.
There are few forces that can stand up to the economic power of corporate America….but…and this is one mighty big but….we may have it.
Simplistic (and naive) as it may sound….it is the collective social/economic/moral compass of America’s nonprofit sector. Laugh if you will, but do not underestimate our collective social, political and economic strength. There are 100 million people who work for, volunteer at or contribute to nonprofits in America. If WE can gather around larger issues, just as Boards of Trade have over the last decades, and then act in unity during elections, then we can get candidates to move beyond slogans and force them to fully develop and articulate detailed plans for how they would partner with us to lead communities forward.
New media outlets (that are effective and FREE) allow us to use our VOICES to organize and rally VOTES to our causes. Sure—corporations can flood outlets like Fox or MSNBC with outrageous ads…but NOW, unlike anytime before, we can overtly counter them without fear of loosing our status as nonprofits. In short…our voice can be mightier than their cash. It must.
This is a moment of sudden, immediate evolution. These two legal opinions come out of the blue for most of us, and propel all nonprofits, even those with the most ardent aversion to the political process, into an era in which we have little choice but to become engaged—to fight together to keep the process of choosing our leaders from being hijacked.
NOW we must work together to rededicate the process of choosing our leaders. We can either submit, and allow by our silence for our work and ideas to be further marginalized, or we can hone our collective compass and help guide our communities to campaigns and candidates who will utilize all our assets for the greater, common good.
Gone now are the days of academic discussions, or studies, or the perceived safety of being a saint on the sidelines. We cannot afford to invest precious time in 10 year plans. A new era is upon us–and it begins today.
Related posts:
Subscribe to this blog
September 21st, 2009 at 10:48 am
Twitter Comment
New legal cases change the NP political landscape. Do we now have 1st Amendment rights to endorse? I say YES. New blog [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Twitter Comment
Court rulings fundamentally alter nonprofit political rules. New Blog – A New Era of Political Equity [link to post] @v3campaign
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger: New legal cases change NP political landscape. Do we now have 1st Amdmt rights to endorse? I say YES. [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger: Court rulings fundamentally alter nonprofit political rules. New Blog – A New Era of Political Equity [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger Court rulings fundamentally alter nonprofit political rules. New Blog – A New Era of Political Equity [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger Court rulings fundamentally alter nonprofit political rules. New Blog: A New Era of Political Equity [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Twitter Comment
@caryncap THANKS for the RT, Caryn!! I think this is HUGE.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Twitter Comment
@Michael_Hoffman thanks for the RT, Michael–this is HUGE.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Twitter Comment
@npmaven Thanks for the RT Debra, as always. I think this is a huge issue.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Twitter Comment
@eclawson THANKS for the RT, EC!!!! I think this is HUGE. You rock.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger New legal cases change the NP political landscape. Do we now have 1st Amendment rights to endorse? [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Twitter Comment
OK PR pros-court ruling changes the game How can you help create this new voice for nonprofs? RT@caryncap RT@robertegger [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Twitter Comment
“Rulings all but remove archaic barriers to nonprofits political involvement” @robertegger #nonprofits & #policy [link to post] #SocEnt
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Twitter Comment
@robertegger Yes, I have been following it. Would love to sit and say hello to u in person sometime. How’s tomorrow? I am in DC 4 the day.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger: New legal cases change NP political landscape. Do we now have 1st Amendmt rights to endorse? I say YES. [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Twitter Comment
New blog post by @robertegger about the importance of nonprofits uniting to create policy changes – [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 3:34 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @robertegger: Do we [nonprofits] now have 1st Amendment rights to endorse? I say YES. New blog [link to post] < < Read it!
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Twitter Comment
@samuelisaac thanks for the bump, Sam
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Twitter Comment
@FCWashington Thanks for the RT, and the home team support
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Twitter Comment
@onestarfdn THANKS, OneStar!!!
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Twitter Comment
@Michael_Hoffman on the road HARD…lansing, san fran and la, all by thursday. Next time?!
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Twitter Comment
@socialedge thanks for the Social E Bump
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Twitter Comment
@memaples thanks for the RT, MnM
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @onestarfdn: New blog post by @robertegger about the importance of nonprofits uniting to create policy changes – [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Twitter Comment
@robertegger You’re welcome! Very interesting post.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 6:45 pm
Twitter Comment
@FCWashington it was written fast, but this is happening VERY fast. I believe this is HUGE.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Twitter Comment
@robertegger for sure. I will let u know next time I am coming in. Safe travels.
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 21st, 2009 at 11:34 pm
Twitter Comment
RT @socialedge: “Rulings all but remove archaic barriers to nonprofits political involvement” @robertegger #nonprofits [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher
September 23rd, 2009 at 11:45 am
Awesome post! Awesome insight! Awesome call to action! Thanks for always being on top of things.
September 24th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Awesome post, and very exciting news. I wish that I was more optimistic about the ‘come together around critical social issues’ piece, but I’ve been struck by how much of the NPO conversation around health care, for example, has focused on the rather narrow tax implications for NPOs as employers, rather than the social justice considerations. And it seems that we struggle, often, to get NPOs to even use those powers they already had (re: advocacy and non-partisan civic participation)–maybe now that we can’t hide behind these restrictions? Anyway, yours is such an important voice!
January 22nd, 2010 at 1:26 pm
[...] Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Citizen’s United vs. the FEC, I wrote a blog (A New Era of Political Equity) articulating what I felt would be the ramifications for nonprofits should the court decide that [...]
March 16th, 2011 at 12:47 am
The voices of over 100 million people will be heard by political campaigns even through the haze of large corporate contributions given to campaigns to “buy” support. Although non-profits cannot match the funds given by corporations to campaigns, a unified force of 100 million people will force these political candidates to follow their platform in order for them to win an election.
Hopefully “our [non-profits] voice can be mightier than their cash.”