A Starbucks Moment for Nonprofits?

Up until the late 1980’s America’s service industry–its restaurants chains and fast food franchises—faced a seemingly impenetrable wall.

Historically, their average employee was a high school or college student, going through a rite of passage—their first job. His or her goals were simple: gain basic employment skills, earn some extra spending money and then move onto a career. As such, businesses seeking scale had to develop limited menus and simple preparation processes that would insure consistency of product based on the skill level and turnover rate of this cohort.

Up until 1988, hamburger chains such as McDonald’s and Burger King had taken this model about as far as it could go. Then came Starbucks, a company that took a calculated risk at a strategic moment in our country’s economic history which allowed them to smash through those barriers and redefine that business model.

In the late 80’s there was a legion of college graduates coming into a market still recovering from the collapse of the Savings and Loan industry. Starbucks’ new executive team, which had been brought on to take the relatively unknown, Seattle based coffee company national, keenly observed this and the broader zeitgeist of the times and seized upon an opportunity.

Seattle was not only Starbucks’ corporate headquarters; it was also the Mecca of the “grunge” culture that was exemplified by local based bands like Nirvana, Pearl Jam and Soundgarden. These million-record selling artists spoke to this underemployed generation and sent a musical message that rejected the “get rich quick” culture that was at the root of the recent economic blow-up, and promoted a lifestyle that espoused societal impact over individual income. Perhaps more importantly for Starbucks’ vision, these bands and their fans also drank coffee, and lots of it.

This is where the company made a brilliant set of decisions that created a model which, if modified, could offer the nonprofit sector a business example which might prove critical to its future economic growth and social vitality.

First, Starbucks planned on selling “to-go” products that were far superior to anything that was currently available in the fast food arena. As such, they knew they needed employees who could master their complicated coffee machines and deliver consistent, yet complex products. These “baristas” were the key to the elevation of the Starbucks brand, so executives made a decision to seek out America’s educated and available college graduates. By offering employment packages with salaries well above any of its competitors, and equally valuable health benefits (even for part-time employees), Starbucks was able to attract a hugely productive new workforce that had heretofore been unwilling to consider working in the “service” industry.

Secondly, Starbucks was an early adapter of cause related marketing. By focusing on fair trade practices and advertising their commitment to staff, the environment, and the global community, they gave employers and customers alike the opportunity to be part of something bigger than themselves. In short—Starbucks employees could make a solid living while also doing good. Of equal importance, consumers could help save the world by buying coffee.

Given these pledges, management knew their products–from triple soy lattes to fresh baked goods to specially made music CDs–would cost more, so they invested in a communications strategy that convinced customers that this would be an investment in themselves and the world.

In short order they elevated the value of once minimized “service” jobs; they convinced customers that paying $4.00 for coffee was a good value and forced their competitors to adapt.

But more than anything else, Starbucks was able to demonstrate that you could invest in talent and grow your business in an economy in which others stood still.

Flash forward to today. Many nonprofit organizations are laying off staff or freezing services. This is certainly understandable, as the current economic climate would suggest that growth is now all but impossible. But some nonprofits have been looking at the business model we have used for decades and are wondering….”Is this our Starbucks moment?”…a time where we move beyond the metaphorical fast food of charity and develop a more sustaining menu of philanthropy. Surprisingly, the opportunities are strikingly similar.

In just a few months, millions of students will be graduating from colleges and universities and trying to find work in an environment crippled by another economic meltdown.

Unlike their Generation X elders, who were at the forefront of the community service movement, this generation has been fully baptized, with most new graduates having 5-7 years of community service under their belts. Like members of the previous generation, they look at the jobs being offered by most nonprofits and, while intrigued by the opportunity to give back, they know that they would be hard pressed to pay back unrelenting student loans or afford rent in many urban cores on the salaries offered by most nonprofit organizations.

This is where forward thinking foundations and charitable organizations are now considering a seemingly counter intuitive push to raise traditional salaries and make strategic hires, with the goal of not just attracting bold new talent, but to elevate the entire concept of charity in America.

There are millions of people, in every corner of the globe who are not only looking for a new way to make a living; they are also looking for a new way to do commerce—and a new way to spend their money. All seem united in a keen desire, as lofty as it may seem, to create wealth without causing damage to the planet or heightening inequalities or injustice. In fact, many consumers now hope to actually turn the tide on poverty and mitigate inequity not with charity, but with commerce.

This could be a great moment for the nonprofit sector. If we can see this era of economic duress as an opportunity to attract new employees that can help us sell a new approach to creating a civil society, then this may be the year we finally move from selling the metaphoric empty calories of fast food, to a healthy, whole lifestyle where commerce and justice share equal seats at the table.

Robert Egger

R Robert is the Founder and President of L.A. Kitchen, which will open in 2013. The L.A. Kitchen will professionally recover fresh food, with an emphasis on fresh fruits and vegetables, which it will use to fuel a culinary arts job training program for men and women coming out of foster care, or older men and women returning from incarceration. Robert pioneered this model during his 24 year tenure as the President of the DC Central Kitchen, the country’s first “community kitchen”, where food donated by hospitality businesses and farms is used to fuel a nationally recognized culinary arts job training program. Since opening in 1989, the Kitchen (which is a $10 million a year, self-sustaining, social enterprise) has produced over 26 million meals and helped 1,000 men and women gain full time employment. The Kitchen operates its own revenue generating business, Fresh Start Catering, as well as the Campus Kitchens Project, which coordinates similar recycling/meal programs in 33 colleges or high school based kitchens. In addition, Robert is the Founder and President of CForward, an advocacy organization that rallies employees of nonprofits to educate candidates about the economic role that nonprofits play in every community, and to support candidates who have detailed plans to strengthen the economy that includes nonprofits. In Washington, Robert was the founding Chair of both the Mayor’s Commission on Nutrition and Street Sense, Washington’s “homeless” newspaper. He was also the Co-Convener of the first Nonprofit Congress, held in Washington DC in 2006. Currently, Robert serves on the Board of the national addiction recovery program, Back On My Feet, the Philanthropic Collaborative, and Chef Jose Andres' World Central Kitchen. Robert’s book on the non-profit sector, Begging for Change: The Dollars and Sense of Making Nonprofits Responsive, Efficient and Rewarding For All, was released in 2004 by HarperCollins. It received the 2005 McAdam Book Award for “Best Nonprofit Management Book” by the Alliance for Nonprofit Management. Robert was included in the Non Profit Times list of the “50 Most Powerful and Influential” nonprofit leaders from 2006-2009. He was the recipient of the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington’s 2007 “Lifetime Achievement” award and the 2004 James Beard Foundation “Humanitarian of the Year” award. He has been named an Oprah Angel, a Washingtonian of the Year, a Point of Light and one of the Ten Most Caring People in America, by the Caring Institute. He is also a 15-gallon blood donor to the American Red Cross. Robert speaks throughout the country and internationally on the subjects of hunger, sustainability, nonprofit political engagement and social enterprise. He writes blogs and editorials to share his ideas about the nonprofit sector and the future of America. To check out Robert’s most recent speaking schedule, blogs, and editorials, please visit www.robertegger.org.  

Website - Twitter - Facebook - More Posts

Related posts:

  1. A Seneca Falls Moment for Nonprofits
  2. Nonprofits and the Economic Meltdown
  3. Nonprofits and the Fear of Saying What You Think

11 Responses to “A Starbucks Moment for Nonprofits?”

  1. What nonprofits can learn from Starbucks « Open hands Says:

    [...] Robert’s thoughts below, and visit his well-written piece for the full article: Flash forward to today. Many nonprofit organizations are laying off staff or freezing services. [...]

  2. Wednesday Highlights « ServeNext.org Blog Says:

    [...] Open Hands makes mention of an article written by Robert Egger entitled “A Starbucks Moment for Nonprofits?” This article compares the success of the “Starbucks model,” to what could be the [...]

  3. Elliot Harkavy Says:

    I like the concept. Can we get Howard Schultz (Or his foundation) to bankroll it?

    In all seriousness, we will need a major, major cash infusion to make this vision happen- Any thoughts on how to inspire the philanthropy to fund these new visions in nonprofit management?

  4. Elliot Harkavy Says:

    Historically, many nonprofits have been staffed by the well to do who could live off their trust funds and not be concerned on the low salaries, but much of that disappeared in the 80′s when Noblesse Oblige was replaced by” Get all that you can”.

    Perhaps there is a way to use Americorps and/or the President’s campaign proposal to expand the “… Read MoreTeach For America” program to other social needs, so that if a person commits to 2-4 years of community service at a bona fide nonprofit, they might have some of their college debt relieved.

  5. Cheryl Says:

    I would love to see a Starbucks moment for nonprofits. For the quickest turn around time, I think a nonprofit giant such as the United Way, Girl Scouts, American Cancer Society, etc would embrace this model and report back very positive results across all or most markets. To say this model works well in places like NYC with very high costs of living as well as Corpus Christi which has a relatively low cost of living would exhibit its broad abilities. So who will it be? What CEO, VP or Board Chair will get hold of the concept and say “ya know what, we can do this.” Maybe the larger nonprofits aren’t willing to take the chance, but I sure hope they are.

  6. Shana Says:

    xposted w/ Facebook. Let’s add class and race to the analysis:

    Of course, I love the idea of investing in young people. But it seems like playing on Americans ideas about class was a big part of Starbucks’ growth. What are the implications of applying this metaphor to nonprofits?

    I was a barista in college, and it really does not take any advanced education to do it. But having middle-class, educated, mostly white baristas did allow Starbucks (and coffehouse culture in general) to separate their brand from fast food’s low-income, mostly non-white employees. And increase the value of their product by its association with hipster, middle-class culture.

    So Starbucks = cooler/smarter. Not because you actually need a college degree to make a latte, but because people will pay more for something purchased from mr. hipster dude. Do we in the nonprofit industry want to continue perpetuating the idea that upper-class/white = smarter or should we try to hire people who are brilliant but lacked the resources to get a degree? Or pay people enough that even if they’re the first person in their family to graduate from college, it’s financially feasible for them to work at a nonprofit.

  7. Rachel Says:

    I really like the thought process behind this article, but I’m not sure I agree with the idea of having a ‘Starbucks’ movement in the nonprofit sector. Sure, non-profits can always use more money to further their endeavors, but I wouldn’t want these organizations to morph into anything that resembles a large corporation.. For me, the appeal of nonprofit and social service work is that the people who choose to work there AREN’T there for the big 6-figure salaries, but rather simply because it is what they want to do, to help other people.

    In response to Elliot, check out the new NYC Service site and Civic Corps program. Its kind of what you’re suggesting, I think, providing incentives to people who commit to service in NYC. It’s a pretty cool concept.
    http://nycservice.org/nyc_civic_corps.php

  8. » links for 2009-06-20 thinkingaboutmedia.com Says:

    [...] A Starbucks Moment for Nonprofits? (Robert Egger) "This could be a great moment for the nonprofit sector. If we can see this era of economic duress as an opportunity to attract new employees that can help us sell a new approach to creating a civil society, then this may be the year we finally move from selling the metaphoric empty calories of fast food, to a healthy, whole lifestyle where commerce and justice share equal seats at the table." Indeed [...]

  9. Lokahi (Brande Jackson) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    Great blog post by @robertegger, check it: [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  10. BethBaldauf (Beth Baldauf) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    RT @tactphil A Starbucks Moment for Nonprofits? Fantastic post by @robertegger [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  11. LizNgonzi (Elizabeth Ngonzi) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    A Starbucks moment for non-profits?: [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

Leave a Reply


Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.